tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11758224.post111265719372110649..comments2023-09-28T07:23:51.376-07:00Comments on ProjectPerko: MehCraig Perkohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13173752470581218239noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11758224.post-1112707415290509322005-04-05T06:23:00.000-07:002005-04-05T06:23:00.000-07:00Hey, I didn't know you had a blog. I'll add you to...Hey, I didn't know you had a blog. I'll add you to my aggregator and blogroll.<BR/><BR/>Also, on the whole blogs-are-ephemeral thing: yes, I agree with you, but I prefer blogs to websites because I can subscribe to a feed and have new content delivered straight to me. Combine that with a social bookmarking service like del.icio.us and I can categorize every post that I think is remotely interesting myself, and keep track of it for all eternity.Darius Kazemihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01646249933207430061noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11758224.post-1112682240876628812005-04-04T23:24:00.000-07:002005-04-04T23:24:00.000-07:00I can't say for sure (in the case of the image), b...I can't say for sure (in the case of the image), but I think the problem you're having with URLs is that you're leaving out the all-important "http://" in them.<BR/><BR/>In your first post, you have a bad link (to your wiki site) because you typed <A HREF="www.projectperko.com" REL="nofollow">real page</A> instead of <A HREF="http://www.projectperko.com" REL="nofollow">real page</A>. So don't forget the "http://"! Without it, browsers such as Firefox correctly interpret any given URL as being relative to the current site.Darren Torpeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00082890578046480571noreply@blogger.com